We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Proton Therapy Has Better Outcome over IMRT for Advanced Head and Neck Cancers

By MedImaging International staff writers
Posted on 21 Jul 2014
Radiation oncologists compared the world’s literature on outcomes of proton beam therapy in the treatment of a range of advanced head and neck cancers of the skull base compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and found that proton beam therapy significantly improved disease-free survival and tumor control when compared to IMRT.

The study’s findings were published June 27, 2014, in the journal Lancet Oncology. “We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of patients treated with proton therapy with patients receiving photon IMRT,” said senior author Robert Foote, MD, a radiation oncologist at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA). “Our findings suggest that the theoretical advantages of proton beam therapy may in fact be real.”

Researchers reviewed cases of nasal cavity and paranasal sinus tumors through extensive database searches. They included studies of patients who had no earlier treatment—neither primary radiation therapy nor adjuvant radiation therapy—and patients who had recurrent disease. Researchers collected data on overall survival, disease-free survival, and tumor control, at five years and at the patient’s longest follow-up. They used random-effect models to pool outcomes across studies and compared event rates of combined outcomes for proton therapy and IMRT using an interaction test.

Researchers discovered disease-free survival to be significantly higher at five years for patients receiving proton therapy than for patients receiving IMRT (72% versus 50%). Tumor control did not differ between treatment groups at five years however tumor control was higher for patients receiving proton therapy than for IMRT at the longest follow-up (81% versus 64%).


Related Links:

Mayo Clinic


Post-Processing Imaging System
DynaCAD Prostate
Ultrasound Table
Women’s Ultrasound EA Table
Biopsy Software
Affirm® Contrast
X-Ray Generator
Advantage Plus Generators

Channels

General/Advanced Imaging

view channel
Image: Example snapshots of the photon energy density at t = 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, 1.1 nanoseconds (ns) on the y = 2.0 cm plane (Horie, S., Yajima, H., Abe, M. et al., Biomedical Engineering Letters (2026). DOI: 10.1007/s13534-026-00578-9)

AI Tool Enables Real-Time Diffuse Optical Tomography for Brain Lesion Detection

Diffuse optical tomography is a noninvasive imaging technique that uses near-infrared light to detect internal abnormalities such as cerebral hemorrhage and tumors. Its clinical utility for real-time ... Read more

Industry News

view channel
Image: MIM KineticID is 510(k)-pending software for dynamic PET imaging and kinetic modeling, enabling time-based radiotracer analysis for clinical and research decisions (Photo courtesy of GE Healthcare)

GE HealthCare Showcases AI-Enabled Nuclear Medicine Portfolio at SNMMI 2026

Nuclear medicine is expanding rapidly as health systems adopt theranostics and broaden access to radiopharmaceuticals, increasing demand for scalable operations and consistent diagnostic confidence.... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.