We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




External Beam Radiotherapy Use in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Does Not Increase Mortality Risks

By MedImaging International staff writers
Posted on 14 Oct 2013
Early-stage breast cancer patients who receive external beam radiotherapy (XRT) are not at higher risk for serious long-term side effects in the chest region, including increase in deaths from cardiac disease and secondary malignancies, according to new research.

The new study’s findings were presented September 2013 at the American Society for Radiation Oncology’s (ASTRO) 55th annual meeting, held in Atlanta (GA, USA). The study utilized patient data from the US National Cancer Institute’s (Bethesda, MD, USA) Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. It evaluated women identified as having primary stage T1aN0 breast cancer (tumor of 5 mm or less that has not metastasized to the lymph nodes), who received surgery, with or without postoperative radiation therapy, between 1990 and 1997. The analysis was done to determine if XRT was associated with increased mortality due to breast cancer, secondary cancer in the chest area or cardiac conditions for these patients; only patients with breast cancer (BC) identified as the first malignancy were included. The women had a median age of 55–59 and were divided into two groups: 2,397 who received XRT after surgery, and 2,988 who did not receive XRT after surgery.

Cause of death (COD) codes were used to identify cardiac mortality, breast cancer mortality, and deaths from secondary chest tumors to evaluate overall survival (OS), breast cancer survival (BCS), second-tumor specific survival, and cardiac-cause specific survival (CCS), and then compared between the XRT and non-XRT groups. The incidence of mortality was compared between the XRT and non-XRT groups utilizing the Chi-Square test; and, the relative risk (RR) and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were performed to assess OS, BCS, second-tumor specific survival and CCS.

At 10 years post-treatment, OS rates were 91.6% for the XRT patients and 87% for the non-XRT group; BCS rates were 97% for the XRT patients and 95.7% for the non-XRT group; and CCS was 96.7% for the XRT patients and 92.7% for the non-XRT group.

Data analysis additionally demonstrates that, with an average follow-up of 14 years, there was no statistically significant difference in deaths from subsequent non-breast cancers in the chest area, most of which were lung cancers. The number of deaths from cardiac causes was not substantially higher for those patients treated with XRT for left-sided breast cancer, compared to those with right-sided breast cancer among the patient sample and time period reviewed. More women from the non-XRT group died from all causes, including cardiac causes, suggesting that those patients had worse general health conditions than the women who received radiation therapy.

“Breast-conserving therapy, consisting of lumpectomy and XRT, has been an excellent approach to early breast cancer treatment, offering equivalent disease control and better cosmetic results compared to mastectomy as demonstrated by multiple randomized controlled trials in the past,” said Jason Ye, MD, the study’s presenting author and a second-year resident in radiation oncology at Weill Cornell Medical College (New York, NY, USA).

“Our study’s results suggest that serious long-term side effects of radiation therapy, such as increase in deaths from cardiac disease and secondary malignancies, are rare. Radiation therapy is an integral part of early-stage breast cancer treatment for those who choose to have a lumpectomy instead of a mastectomy, with its benefits likely far outweighing the potential risks in majority of the cases. The field of radiation oncology is rapidly changing, with new technology constantly being introduced that may reduce these risks further. Continued long-term follow-up and additional studies are needed to monitor for potential long-term side effects.”

Related Links:

Weill Cornell Medical College



Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System
MS22Plus
Floor‑Mounted Digital X‑Ray System
MasteRad MX30+
Silver Member
X-Ray QA Device
Accu-Gold+ Touch Pro
Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy & Visualization Tools
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) Guided Devices

Channels

General/Advanced Imaging

view channel
Image: Example snapshots of the photon energy density at t = 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, 1.1 nanoseconds (ns) on the y = 2.0 cm plane (Horie, S., Yajima, H., Abe, M. et al., Biomedical Engineering Letters (2026). DOI: 10.1007/s13534-026-00578-9)

AI Tool Enables Real-Time Diffuse Optical Tomography for Brain Lesion Detection

Diffuse optical tomography is a noninvasive imaging technique that uses near-infrared light to detect internal abnormalities such as cerebral hemorrhage and tumors. Its clinical utility for real-time ... Read more

Industry News

view channel
Image: MIM KineticID is 510(k)-pending software for dynamic PET imaging and kinetic modeling, enabling time-based radiotracer analysis for clinical and research decisions (Photo courtesy of GE Healthcare)

GE HealthCare Showcases AI-Enabled Nuclear Medicine Portfolio at SNMMI 2026

Nuclear medicine is expanding rapidly as health systems adopt theranostics and broaden access to radiopharmaceuticals, increasing demand for scalable operations and consistent diagnostic confidence.... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.