We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.
Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us
Ampronix,  Inc

Download Mobile App




Study Compares Survival Outcomes Using Different Cancer Staging Methods

By Medimaging International staff writers
Posted on 05 Oct 2016
Print article
Image: An artist’s rendition showing lung cancer (Photo courtesy of Dreamstime).
Image: An artist’s rendition showing lung cancer (Photo courtesy of Dreamstime).
Researchers in the Netherlands have compared five-year survival rates for mediastinal nodal lung cancer staging, after treatment with endosonography or mediastinoscopy.

The results of the study were published in the September 13, 2016, issue of the journal JAMA. Accurate mediastinal nodal staging directs therapy, and provides prognostic value during the management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

The Assessment of Surgical Staging vs Endosonographic Ultrasound in Lung Cancer (ASTER) trial compared an endosonographic staging strategy with surgical staging using mediastinoscopy. Endosonography combines endobronchial, and transesophageal ultrasound, and is followed up using mediastinoscopy, in case the results are negative.

The researchers evaluated 241 patients suffering from potentially resectable NSCLC, in 4 tertiary referral centers. There were 123 patients randomized to endosonographic staging, and 118 patients to surgical staging. The researchers found that endosonography was significantly more sensitive (97%) during the diagnosis of mediastinal nodal metastases, compared to surgical staging (79%).

The five-year survival rate was 35% for both the endosonographic and surgical strategies. The estimated median survival for the endosonographic strategy was 31 months compared to 33 months for the surgical strategy. The researchers concluded that improved mediastinal staging could ensure better treatment for a larger number of patients, and could increase the long-term survival rates of the patients.

Jouke T. Annema, MD, PhD, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (Amsterdam, Netherlands), said, "Why did improved mediastinal staging not lead to improved survival? Missing data occurred in less than 2 percent and therefore are an unlikely source of bias. However, ASTER was powered to detect a difference in diagnostic sensitivity, not survival, as reflected by the wide confidence intervals. If a survival difference between the strategies exists, it is likely to be small and a larger sample size may be needed to detect it. However, randomized trials to detect a survival difference based on staging strategy are not likely to be conducted as the endosonographic strategy is now advised in clinical guidelines."

Related Links:
Academic Medical Center


Print article
Radcal

Channels

Industry News

view channel
Image: A demonstration featuring ACR AI-LAB will allow Summit attendees to gain a better understanding of how radiologists can use ACR AI-LAB tools to learn the basics of AI and participate in the creation, evaluation and use of health care AI (Photo courtesy of ACR).

Imaging Informatics Summit Highlights Impact of AI Technologies on Patient Care

The 2019 Imaging Informatics Summit organized by the American College of Radiology {(ACR) Reston, VA, USA} will be held in Washington, D.C., USA, on October 5–6, 2019, and will focus on the role that artificial... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2019 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.