We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
IBA-Radcal

Download Mobile App




Surge in CT Scans for Patients with Minor Injuries

By MedImaging International staff writers
Posted on 07 Feb 2016
A new study reveals that almost twice as many patients with non-serious injuries are undergoing computerized tomography (CT) scans in the emergency department (ED) compared to a decade ago.

Researchers at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF; USA) and Stanford University (CA, USA) conducted a retrospective analysis of the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (Sacramento, USA) emergency department and ambulatory surgery data from 2005 to 2013. A total of 8,535,831 adult patients were identified with an injury severity score lower than 9 who were discharged home. The primary outcome measure was prevalence of CT imaging for each year, and clinical and hospital-level factors related to CT use.

The results showed that 5.9% of the study population received at least one CT study during their ED visit, with the proportion of patients with at least one CT scan increasing from 3.51% in 2005 to 7.17% in 2013. Predictors for CT administration included age (18-24 years, or older than 45 years), Medicare and self-pay patients, fall injuries, motor vehicle collision injuries, and patients seen at level I/II trauma centers (39%), compared with 3% at low-level centers. The study was published on January 19, 2016, in the Journal of Surgical Research.

“The reasons for this increase are multifactorial,” said senior author Renee Hsia, MD, a professor of emergency medicine and health policy at UCSF. “They range from defensive medicine practices, the superior diagnostic accuracy of CT scans compared with X-rays, to their increased availability and convenience in emergency departments, and the demand to expedite discharge of patients.”

“The message for both patients and physicians is that there are long-term risks associated with radiation exposure and there may be situations where imaging is not definitively warranted or beneficial,” concluded Dr. Hsia. “We can't conclusively say which cases should not involve imaging, since every patient and every circumstance is different, but given that it is getting easier and easier to get CT scans, we need to be cautious in weighing their risks and benefits.”

Related Links:

University of California, San Francisco
Stanford University
California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development


Digital X-Ray Detector Panel
Acuity G4
Ultrasound Needle Guidance System
SonoSite L25
Portable X-ray Unit
AJEX140H
Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy & Visualization Tools
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) Guided Devices

Channels

Nuclear Medicine

view channel
Image: This artistic representation illustrates how the drug candidate NECT-224 works in the human body (Photo courtesy of HZDR/A. Gruetzner)

Radiopharmaceutical Molecule Marker to Improve Choice of Bladder Cancer Therapies

Targeted cancer therapies only work when tumor cells express the specific molecular structures they are designed to attack. In urothelial carcinoma, a common form of bladder cancer, the cell surface protein... Read more

Imaging IT

view channel
Image: The new Medical Imaging Suite makes healthcare imaging data more accessible, interoperable and useful (Photo courtesy of Google Cloud)

New Google Cloud Medical Imaging Suite Makes Imaging Healthcare Data More Accessible

Medical imaging is a critical tool used to diagnose patients, and there are billions of medical images scanned globally each year. Imaging data accounts for about 90% of all healthcare data1 and, until... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.