We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Concerns Over Avoiding Mammography Due to Overestimation of Radiation Exposure

By MedImaging International staff writers
Posted on 20 May 2014
In a study to determine the baseline perception of the radiation associated with mammography screening among patients presenting for initial or follow-up imaging, women were asked to rate the amount of radiation received in a single mammogram as being significantly less, slightly less, about the same, slightly more, or substantially more compared to a series of radiation benchmarks.

Confusion and misinformation about the risks associated with ionizing radiation create increased public concern and worry, and may result in avoidance of screening mammography that can identify early cancers. None of the study participants accurately ordered all six of the benchmarks; on average, they considerably overestimated the amount of radiation associated with a mammogram in comparison to other radiation benchmarks.

“Our findings indicate a need to educate patients about the amount of radiation they are exposed to during a single screening mammogram,” said Jacqueline Hollada, a member of the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA; USA) research team. “Using everyday sources of radiation exposure as benchmarks can help add perspective and improve patients’ understanding of radiation levels associated with mammography, thereby reducing anxiety related to the examination.”

The authors concluded that medical staff should make concentrated effort to accurately inform women of the risks and benefits of mammography--specifically emphasizing the low dose of mammographic ionizing radiation--and provide objective facts to ensure that women make informed decisions about screening.

Ms. Hollada presented her study’s findings at the 2014 American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS) annual meeting, held in San Diego (CA, USA), on May 4–9, 2014.

Related Links:

University of California Los Angeles


Floor‑Mounted Digital X‑Ray System
MasteRad MX30+
Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy & Visualization Tools
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) Guided Devices
Breast Localization System
MAMMOREP LOOP
X-ray Diagnostic System
FDX Visionary-A

Channels

Industry News

view channel
Image: MIM KineticID is 510(k)-pending software for dynamic PET imaging and kinetic modeling, enabling time-based radiotracer analysis for clinical and research decisions (Photo courtesy of GE Healthcare)

GE HealthCare Showcases AI-Enabled Nuclear Medicine Portfolio at SNMMI 2026

Nuclear medicine is expanding rapidly as health systems adopt theranostics and broaden access to radiopharmaceuticals, increasing demand for scalable operations and consistent diagnostic confidence.... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.