We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
GLOBETECH PUBLISHING LLC

Download Mobile App




Concerns Over Avoiding Mammography Due to Overestimation of Radiation Exposure

By MedImaging International staff writers
Posted on 20 May 2014
In a study to determine the baseline perception of the radiation associated with mammography screening among patients presenting for initial or follow-up imaging, women were asked to rate the amount of radiation received in a single mammogram as being significantly less, slightly less, about the same, slightly more, or substantially more compared to a series of radiation benchmarks.

Confusion and misinformation about the risks associated with ionizing radiation create increased public concern and worry, and may result in avoidance of screening mammography that can identify early cancers. None of the study participants accurately ordered all six of the benchmarks; on average, they considerably overestimated the amount of radiation associated with a mammogram in comparison to other radiation benchmarks.

“Our findings indicate a need to educate patients about the amount of radiation they are exposed to during a single screening mammogram,” said Jacqueline Hollada, a member of the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA; USA) research team. “Using everyday sources of radiation exposure as benchmarks can help add perspective and improve patients’ understanding of radiation levels associated with mammography, thereby reducing anxiety related to the examination.”

The authors concluded that medical staff should make concentrated effort to accurately inform women of the risks and benefits of mammography--specifically emphasizing the low dose of mammographic ionizing radiation--and provide objective facts to ensure that women make informed decisions about screening.

Ms. Hollada presented her study’s findings at the 2014 American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS) annual meeting, held in San Diego (CA, USA), on May 4–9, 2014.

Related Links:

University of California Los Angeles


High-Precision QA Tool
DEXA Phantom
Portable X-ray Unit
AJEX140H
Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System
MS22Plus
Mobile X-Ray System
K4W

Channels

Nuclear Medicine

view channel
Image: LHSCRI scientist Dr. Glenn Bauman stands in front of the PET scanner (Photo courtesy of LHSCRI)

New Imaging Solution Improves Survival for Patients with Recurring Prostate Cancer

Detecting recurrent prostate cancer remains one of the most difficult challenges in oncology, as standard imaging methods such as bone scans and CT scans often fail to accurately locate small or early-stage tumors.... Read more

General/Advanced Imaging

view channel
Image: Concept of the photo-thermoresponsive SCNPs (J F Thümmler et al., Commun Chem (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s42004-025-01518-x)

New Ultrasmall, Light-Sensitive Nanoparticles Could Serve as Contrast Agents

Medical imaging technologies face ongoing challenges in capturing accurate, detailed views of internal processes, especially in conditions like cancer, where tracking disease development and treatment... Read more

Imaging IT

view channel
Image: The new Medical Imaging Suite makes healthcare imaging data more accessible, interoperable and useful (Photo courtesy of Google Cloud)

New Google Cloud Medical Imaging Suite Makes Imaging Healthcare Data More Accessible

Medical imaging is a critical tool used to diagnose patients, and there are billions of medical images scanned globally each year. Imaging data accounts for about 90% of all healthcare data1 and, until... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2025 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.