We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
IBA-Radcal

Download Mobile App




Concerns Over Avoiding Mammography Due to Overestimation of Radiation Exposure

By MedImaging International staff writers
Posted on 20 May 2014
In a study to determine the baseline perception of the radiation associated with mammography screening among patients presenting for initial or follow-up imaging, women were asked to rate the amount of radiation received in a single mammogram as being significantly less, slightly less, about the same, slightly more, or substantially more compared to a series of radiation benchmarks.

Confusion and misinformation about the risks associated with ionizing radiation create increased public concern and worry, and may result in avoidance of screening mammography that can identify early cancers. None of the study participants accurately ordered all six of the benchmarks; on average, they considerably overestimated the amount of radiation associated with a mammogram in comparison to other radiation benchmarks.

“Our findings indicate a need to educate patients about the amount of radiation they are exposed to during a single screening mammogram,” said Jacqueline Hollada, a member of the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA; USA) research team. “Using everyday sources of radiation exposure as benchmarks can help add perspective and improve patients’ understanding of radiation levels associated with mammography, thereby reducing anxiety related to the examination.”

The authors concluded that medical staff should make concentrated effort to accurately inform women of the risks and benefits of mammography--specifically emphasizing the low dose of mammographic ionizing radiation--and provide objective facts to ensure that women make informed decisions about screening.

Ms. Hollada presented her study’s findings at the 2014 American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS) annual meeting, held in San Diego (CA, USA), on May 4–9, 2014.

Related Links:

University of California Los Angeles


Radiation Safety Barrier
RayShield Intensi-Barrier
Post-Processing Imaging System
DynaCAD Prostate
Biopsy Software
Affirm® Contrast
Computed Tomography System
Aquilion ONE / INSIGHT Edition

Channels

Nuclear Medicine

view channel
Image: This artistic representation illustrates how the drug candidate NECT-224 works in the human body (Photo courtesy of HZDR/A. Gruetzner)

Radiopharmaceutical Molecule Marker to Improve Choice of Bladder Cancer Therapies

Targeted cancer therapies only work when tumor cells express the specific molecular structures they are designed to attack. In urothelial carcinoma, a common form of bladder cancer, the cell surface protein... Read more

Imaging IT

view channel
Image: The new Medical Imaging Suite makes healthcare imaging data more accessible, interoperable and useful (Photo courtesy of Google Cloud)

New Google Cloud Medical Imaging Suite Makes Imaging Healthcare Data More Accessible

Medical imaging is a critical tool used to diagnose patients, and there are billions of medical images scanned globally each year. Imaging data accounts for about 90% of all healthcare data1 and, until... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.