We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
Radcal IBA  Group

Download Mobile App




Radiologists Clash on Management of Incidental Findings

By MedImaging International staff writers
Posted on 21 Nov 2011
According to a recent study, many radiologists disagree on the management of incidental findings found on body computed tomography (CT) imaging scans.

The study’s findings were published in the November 2011 issue of the Journal of the American College of Radiology. Recent developments in CT imaging resolution have improved radiologists’ ability to detect small or subtle findings. In combination with increasing CT utilization, this has driven the rate with which incidental findings are discovered. However, published guidelines for the management of many incidental findings are only just emerging. “The purpose of our study was to evaluate for agreement among body CT attending radiologists, both within departments and across academic institutions, for the management of a number of commonly encountered incidental findings on body CT,” said Pamela T. Johnson, MD, from Johns Hopkins University (JHU; Baltimore, MD, USA), and lead author of the study.

JHU Researchers administered a multiple-choice survey to 27 radiologists at three separate academic institutions, asking them how they would handle 12 incidental findings on body CT scans. The findings revealed that 70% or greater agreement on interpretation was identified for only six findings.

“It is important to note that at present, 100% agreement was not identified for the management of any of the 12 findings. An equally essential discovery is the lack of agreement across academic institutions and even within individual institutions for other incidental findings,” concluded Dr. Johnson. “Our findings signal the need for individual departments to develop internal guidelines so that radiologists make the best recommendations on the basis of existing evidence and provide consistent advice to referring physicians.”

Related Links:
Johns Hopkins University


High-Precision QA Tool
DEXA Phantom
Medical Radiographic X-Ray Machine
TR30N HF
X-ray Diagnostic System
FDX Visionary-A
Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System
MS22Plus

Channels

Nuclear Medicine

view channel
Image: LHSCRI scientist Dr. Glenn Bauman stands in front of the PET scanner (Photo courtesy of LHSCRI)

New Imaging Solution Improves Survival for Patients with Recurring Prostate Cancer

Detecting recurrent prostate cancer remains one of the most difficult challenges in oncology, as standard imaging methods such as bone scans and CT scans often fail to accurately locate small or early-stage tumors.... Read more

General/Advanced Imaging

view channel
Image: Concept of the photo-thermoresponsive SCNPs (J F Thümmler et al., Commun Chem (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s42004-025-01518-x)

New Ultrasmall, Light-Sensitive Nanoparticles Could Serve as Contrast Agents

Medical imaging technologies face ongoing challenges in capturing accurate, detailed views of internal processes, especially in conditions like cancer, where tracking disease development and treatment... Read more

Imaging IT

view channel
Image: The new Medical Imaging Suite makes healthcare imaging data more accessible, interoperable and useful (Photo courtesy of Google Cloud)

New Google Cloud Medical Imaging Suite Makes Imaging Healthcare Data More Accessible

Medical imaging is a critical tool used to diagnose patients, and there are billions of medical images scanned globally each year. Imaging data accounts for about 90% of all healthcare data1 and, until... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2025 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.