We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Cost-Effectiveness of Digital Mammography Screening Questioned

By MedImaging staff writers
Posted on 11 Feb 2008
Digital mammography does not improve health enough to justify its higher cost unless its use is limited to women under age 50 or women with dense breasts, according to a cost-effectiveness study comparing digital mammography and conventional film mammography for breast cancer screening.

The study, conducted by researchers from Dartmouth Medical School (Hannover, NH, USA), revealed that health outcomes were the same between screening methods when all women were considered, but improved when digital was limited to younger women or women with dense breasts, resulting in cost effectiveness only in those subgroups. For the Medicare-aged (older) population, digital mammography provided no apparent benefit and there was a suggestion that film mammography may be better for older women with non-dense breasts.

"It was important for us to learn how changes in breast cancer detection project into changes in life expectancy. Only by considering long-term health outcomes can we assess the value of the digital mammography relative to other healthcare interventions,” said lead author Dr. Anna N.A. Tosteson, a Dartmouth Medical School professor of medicine and of community and family medicine. "What we found is that the higher cost of digital mammography is not justified by better health outcomes unless its use is directed to younger women or those with dense breast tissue,” continued Dr. Tosteson, also from the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice and the Norris Cotton Cancer Center at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center.

Data for the study were collected through the Digital Mammography Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST), which involved more than 42,000 women in the United States and Canada. The cost-effectiveness analysis determined work-up costs associated with digital versus film and projected long-term health outcomes using computer simulation methods. Based on Medicare prices, the cost of a digital mammogram is about US$50 higher than the cost of a traditional film mammogram.

Although rates have been declining, breast cancer remains the second-leading cause of cancer death among women in the United States. The U.S. National Cancer Institute and others, attribute a decrease in breast cancer deaths in part to an increase in detection through regular mammograms. Currently, about 33.5 million mammograms are conducted in the United States each year.

This research was published in the January 1, 2008, issue of the journal Annals of Internal Medicine.


Related Links:
Dartmouth Medical School
X-ray Diagnostic System
FDX Visionary-A
Medical Radiographic X-Ray Machine
TR30N HF
Ultrasound Table
Women’s Ultrasound EA Table
Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy & Visualization Tools
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) Guided Devices

Channels

Industry News

view channel
Image: MIM KineticID is 510(k)-pending software for dynamic PET imaging and kinetic modeling, enabling time-based radiotracer analysis for clinical and research decisions (Photo courtesy of GE Healthcare)

GE HealthCare Showcases AI-Enabled Nuclear Medicine Portfolio at SNMMI 2026

Nuclear medicine is expanding rapidly as health systems adopt theranostics and broaden access to radiopharmaceuticals, increasing demand for scalable operations and consistent diagnostic confidence.... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.