We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
GLOBETECH PUBLISHING LLC

Download Mobile App




Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging Can Reduce the Number of Unnecessary Breast Biopsies

By MedImaging International staff writers
Posted on 16 Apr 2009
Print article
Women who require additional diagnostic imaging after a questionable mammogram may be at risk for unnecessary biopsies when only magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is offered, according to a new study.

The new findings on breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) technology and MRI with regard to breast biopsies were presented at the 19th annual U.S. National Interdisciplinary Breast Center Conference in Las Vegas, NV, USA, in March 2009. "Our goal was to see if BSGI could be used to improve upon the specificity of MRI, and also reduce the number of biopsies. The study is important because with the addition of BSGI, we could eliminate the need for 50% of biopsies or possibly change a patient's decision to have more radical surgery," said Dr. Leora Lanzkowsky, director of women's imaging, Catholic Healthcare West- (CHW)-Nevada Imaging Centers (Las Vegas, NV, USA).

BSGI has comparable sensitivity but superior specificity when compared to MRI. Sensitivity refers to the ability of an imaging technique to detect the presence of disease. Specificity refers to the technique's ability to detect that disease is actually not present.

BSGI, a molecular breast imaging technique, is a follow-up to mammography that can see lesions independent of tissue density and discover early stage cancers. With BSGI, the patient receives a pharmaceutical tracing agent that is absorbed by all the cells in the body. Due to their increased rate of metabolic activity, cancerous cells in the breast absorb a greater amount of the tracing agent than normal, healthy cells and generally appear as "hot spots" on the BSGI image.

Over the course of 18 months, at three medical centers, BSGI and MRI were performed in women requiring additional diagnostic imaging following a mammogram as deemed necessary by a physician. Most of these patients had either a personal history of breast cancer or a combination of other factors placing them at high-risk for breast carcinoma. The interpreting radiologist had access to all prior images and patient information for image interpretation for both studies. All biopsies were performed as deemed necessary by a physician.

In the 4th study, there were 120 women who had 122 abnormal biopsies requiring additional intervention. There were a total of 16 high-risk lesions (11 ADH, four LCIS, and one papilloma) and 106 malignant lesions (17 DCIS, 70 IDC, 14 ILC, three papillary carcinomas, one tubular and one squamous cell carcinoma). BSGI was negative in a total of 10 cases (six malignancies and four high risk lesions) and indeterminate in three (all malignancies). MRI was negative in a total of 11 cases (seven malignancies and four high risk lesions) and indeterminate in six (three malignancies and three high-risk lesions). Excluding the indeterminate findings from the sensitivity analysis, BSGI was positive in 110/120 cases (90.6% sensitivity) and MRI was positive in 106 out of 117 cases (90.6% sensitivity). BSGI was equal in sensitivity to breast MRI in the detection of malignant and high-risk breast lesions, while reducing the rate of indeterminate findings by 50%.

Of the 37 patients who had benign biopsy results, MRI and BSGI were concordant in 16 patients yielding a specificity of 38%. For the patients with discordant MRI and BSGI findings, BSGI specificity was 52% while MRI had a specificity of 19%. Overall, the specificity for BSGI and MRI were 46% and 27%, respectively. "If we can utilize BSGI to avoid unnecessary biopsies, not only are we saving women from an uncomfortable procedure, scarring and the expense of surgery, we save time so patients can move more quickly to treatment," said Dr. Lanzkowsky. "In this group of patients with complex radiographic findings requiring both BSGI and MRI in the course of clinical care, BSGI provided comparable sensitivity, higher specificity, and fewer indeterminate results than MRI."

One such developer of the technology, Dilon Technologies, Inc. (Newport News, VA, USA), has the Dilon 6800, a high-resolution, compact gamma camera optimized to perform BSGI. The camera provides a manageable four to 16 images versus up to thousands of images with breast MRI.

Related Links:

CHW-Nevada Imaging Centers
Dilon Technologies



New
Biopsy Software
Affirm® Contrast
New
Prostate Cancer MRI Analysis Tool
DynaCAD Urology
New
Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy & Visualization Tools
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) Guided Devices
Computed Tomography System
Aquilion ONE / INSIGHT Edition

Print article

Channels

Radiography

view channel
Image: AI can identify “mammographically-visible” types of interval cancers earlier by flagging them at the time of screening (Photo courtesy of ScreenPoint Medical)

AI Improves Early Detection of Interval Breast Cancers

Interval breast cancers, which occur between routine screenings, are easier to treat when detected earlier. Early detection can reduce the need for aggressive treatments and improve the chances of better outcomes.... Read more

Imaging IT

view channel
Image: The new Medical Imaging Suite makes healthcare imaging data more accessible, interoperable and useful (Photo courtesy of Google Cloud)

New Google Cloud Medical Imaging Suite Makes Imaging Healthcare Data More Accessible

Medical imaging is a critical tool used to diagnose patients, and there are billions of medical images scanned globally each year. Imaging data accounts for about 90% of all healthcare data1 and, until... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2025 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.