We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
GLOBETECH PUBLISHING LLC

Download Mobile App




Breast Screening for Women over 70 Does Not Result in Sharp Drop in Advanced Disease

By MedImaging International staff writers
Posted on 22 Sep 2014
Breast screening for women over age 70 does not prompt a sharp fall in advanced disease. Instead, it may just lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment, suggests new findings by Dutch researchers.

The researchers led by a team based at Leiden University Medical Center (The Netherlands) are presenting their data at the Preventing Overdiagnosis Conference, held September 15–17, 2014, in Oxford (UK), where experts worldwide will discuss how to handle the threat to health and the waste of money caused by unnecessary care. The conference is hosted by the Center for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford (UK) in partnership with the British Medical Journal (BMJ) "Too Much Medicine campaign."

The upper age limit for the national breast cancer screening program was extended to women aged 69 to 75 in 1998 in the Netherlands, and national guidelines now recommend screening women up to the age of 75. This is in spite of no strong evidence showing that screening much older women is effective, according to the researchers, due to the scarcity of this age group in any of the clinical trials on which the policy is founded. However, breast cancer is the most common cancer and biggest cause of death from cancer in women worldwide. Furthermore, as populations age, the percentage of older women who are diagnosed with the disease is set to increase in the developed world.

The researchers therefore set out to find whether the national breast screening program in the Netherlands has made a significant impact in the numbers of late stage cancers among 70–75 year old—a hallmark of success. They monitored all new cases of invasive and non-invasive (in situ) breast cancer, diagnosed in this age group from 1995 up to 2011, using data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. They separated cases into the period before (1995-7), after (2003-11), and in-between (1998-2002) the introduction of the national screening program, which came to almost 25,500 in all. Furthermore, they included 13,000 women aged 76–80, to take account of any changes in breast cancer incidence among older women ineligible for national screening.

Data analysis showed that new cases of early stage breast cancer among 70–75 year olds rose sharply after national screening was introduced, from 248.7 to 362.9 per 100,000 women. However, while there was a substantial decrease in the numbers of new cases of advanced breast cancer, the absolute decrease was small; dropping from 58.6 before, to 51.8 instances per 100,000 women after, the national screening program was introduced.

Among 76–80 year olds, new cases of early stage disease fell slightly, but the numbers of new cases of advance breast cancer did not change. The researchers calculated, based on the figures, that for every advanced stage cancer detected by screening among 70–75 year olds, around 20 “extra” and therefore “overdiagnosed” early stage tumors are identified, which the researchers described as a “considerable proportion.”

Overdiagnosis and overtreatment are important, the researchers emphasized, because they can undermine quality of life, and because older individuals are more susceptible to the side effects of breast cancer treatment. Moreover, they come with a potentially huge cost in return for little obvious health benefit, the investigators pointed out. “Instead of using mass screening, the decision to participate in the screening program should be personalized, based on remaining life expectancy, breast cancer risk, functional status and patients’ preferences,” the authors concluded.

The study’s findings were published September 16, 2014, in the British Medical Journal (BMJ).

Related Links:

Leiden University Medical Center


Ultrasound Imaging System
P12 Elite
X-ray Diagnostic System
FDX Visionary-A
New
High-Precision QA Tool
DEXA Phantom
3T MRI Scanner
MAGNETOM Cima.X

Channels

Ultrasound

view channel
Image: The new implantable device for chronic pain management is small and flexible (Photo courtesy of The Zhou Lab at USC)

Wireless Chronic Pain Management Device to Reduce Need for Painkillers and Surgery

Chronic pain affects millions of people globally, often leading to long-term disability and dependence on opioid medications, which carry significant risks of side effects and addiction.... Read more

Nuclear Medicine

view channel
Image: The diagnostic tool could improve diagnosis and treatment decisions for patients with chronic lung infections (Photo courtesy of SNMMI)

Novel Bacteria-Specific PET Imaging Approach Detects Hard-To-Diagnose Lung Infections

Mycobacteroides abscessus is a rapidly growing mycobacteria that primarily affects immunocompromised patients and those with underlying lung diseases, such as cystic fibrosis or chronic obstructive pulmonary... Read more

Imaging IT

view channel
Image: The new Medical Imaging Suite makes healthcare imaging data more accessible, interoperable and useful (Photo courtesy of Google Cloud)

New Google Cloud Medical Imaging Suite Makes Imaging Healthcare Data More Accessible

Medical imaging is a critical tool used to diagnose patients, and there are billions of medical images scanned globally each year. Imaging data accounts for about 90% of all healthcare data1 and, until... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2025 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.