Image: New research closes the gap between traditional and deep learning methods (Photo courtesy of University of Minnesota)
For the last decade or so, scientists have been making Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) faster using a technique called compressed sensing, which uses the idea that images can be compressed into smaller sizes, akin to zipping a .jpeg on a computer. More recently, researchers have been looking into using deep learning, a type of machine learning, to speed up MRI image reconstruction. Instead of capturing every frequency during the MRI procedure, this process skips over frequencies and uses a trained machine learning algorithm to predict the results and fill in those gaps.
Many studies have shown deep learning to be better than traditional compressed sensing by a large margin. However, there are some concerns with using deep learning - for example, having insufficient training data could create a bias in the algorithm that might cause it to misinterpret the MRI results. Now, using a combination of modern data science tools and machine learning ideas, researchers have found a way to fine-tune the traditional compressing method to make it nearly as high-quality as deep learning. This finding by scientists and engineers at the University of Minnesota (Minneapolis, MN, USA) provides a new research direction for the field of MRI reconstruction. It can improve the performance of traditional MRI reconstruction techniques, allowing for faster MRIs to improve healthcare.
“MRIs take a long time because you’re acquiring the data in a sequential manner. You have to fill up the frequency space of your image in a successive manner,” explained Mehmet Akcakaya, the Jim and Sara Anderson Associate Professor in the University of Minnesota Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. “We want to make MRIs faster so that patients are there for shorter times and so that we can increase the efficiency in the healthcare system.”
“What we’re saying is that there’s a lot of hype surrounding deep learning in MRIs, but maybe that gap between new and traditional methods isn’t as big as previously reported,” Akcakaya said. “We found that if you tune the classical methods, they can perform very well. So, maybe we should go back and look at the classical methods and see if we can get better results. There is a lot of great research surrounding deep learning as well, but we’re trying to look at both sides of the picture to see where we can find the best performance, theoretical guarantees, and stability.”
University of Minnesota
SBRT Phantom with Removable Spine
E2E SBRT Phantom with Removable Spine Model 036S-CVXX-xx
Endoscopic Ultrasound Processor
Air Displacement Plethysmography System
Handheld Ultrasound Machine