We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us
GLOBETECH PUBLISHING LLC

Download Mobile App




New Study Questions Benefits of Patient Shielding during Imaging

By MedImaging International staff writers
Posted on 16 Apr 2019
Print article
A new study claims that patient shielding in diagnostic imaging provides negligible benefits and actually increases risks.

A study written by researchers at the University of Colorado School of Medicine (Aurora, CO, USA) reviews the historical rationale for patient shielding, explains why the risks that come with patient shielding now outweigh what little benefit still exists, and makes the case for why it is time to abandon the legacy practice of patient shielding in radiology. First introduced as a regulation in 1976 in order to protect patients from the hereditary risks of radiation exposure, the wording has not changed since the initial version was released, despite the fact no hereditary effects have been observed in humans since the regulation was introduced.

In addition, as the authors point out, radiation doses during the four decades since the regulation was released have decreased significantly, thanks to advances in imaging technology. For instance, radiation doses to patients undergoing anteroposterior examinations of the pelvis have decreased more than 96% over the last 60 years. They also suggest that as more imaging technologies currently rely on automatic exposure control, patient shields could lead to an increase in radiation doses due to attenuation, and to a decrease in image quality. The study was published in the April 2019 issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology.

“It is important to think about how much protection is really being provided to the patient. For anatomy outside the imaging field of view [FOV], radiation exposure results almost entirely from internal scatter generated within a patient,” wrote study authors Rebecca Milman Marsh, PhD, and Michael Silosky, MSc. “As contact shielding cannot protect against internal scatter, shielding anatomy outside the imaging FOV provides negligible protection to the patient. This holds true for all examinations, including those of pediatric and pregnant patients.”

“The assumption is that shielding improves patient safety. This belief is often regarded as fact, with little consideration given to its veracity,” concluded the authors. “Although change is difficult, it is incumbent on radiologic technologists, medical physicists, and radiologists to abandon the practice of patient shielding in radiology. This is especially important regarding issues of radiation risk, for which misinformation is rampant. Consequently, how to address patient concerns as facilities stop providing patient shielding should be considered.”

Related Links:
University of Colorado School of Medicine

Gold Member
Solid State Kv/Dose Multi-Sensor
AGMS-DM+
New
Brachytherapy Planning System
Oncentra Brachy
Laptop Ultrasound Scanner
PL-3018
New
Color Doppler Ultrasound System
DRE Crystal 4PX

Print article

Channels

Ultrasound

view channel
Image: Structure of the proposed transparent ultrasound transducer and its optical transmittance (Photo courtesy of POSTECH)

Ultrasensitive Broadband Transparent Ultrasound Transducer Enhances Medical Diagnosis

The ultrasound-photoacoustic dual-modal imaging system combines molecular imaging contrast with ultrasound imaging. It can display molecular and structural details inside the body in real time without... Read more

Nuclear Medicine

view channel
Image: PET/CT of a 60-year-old male patient with clinical suspicion of lung cancer (Photo courtesy of EJNMMI Physics)

Early 30-Minute Dynamic FDG-PET Acquisition Could Halve Lung Scan Times

F-18 FDG-PET scans are a way to look inside the body using a special dye, and these scans can be either static or dynamic. Static scans happen 60 minutes after the dye is administered into the body, showing... Read more

Imaging IT

view channel
Image: The new Medical Imaging Suite makes healthcare imaging data more accessible, interoperable and useful (Photo courtesy of Google Cloud)

New Google Cloud Medical Imaging Suite Makes Imaging Healthcare Data More Accessible

Medical imaging is a critical tool used to diagnose patients, and there are billions of medical images scanned globally each year. Imaging data accounts for about 90% of all healthcare data1 and, until... Read more

Industry News

view channel
Image: The acquisition will expand IBA’s medical imaging quality assurance offering (Photo courtesy of Radcal)

IBA Acquires Radcal to Expand Medical Imaging Quality Assurance Offering

Ion Beam Applications S.A. (IBA, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium), the global leader in particle accelerator technology and a world-leading provider of dosimetry and quality assurance (QA) solutions, has entered... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.