We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us
GLOBETECH PUBLISHING LLC

Download Mobile App




No Proof That X-ray Radiation Causes Cancer

By MedImaging International staff writers
Posted on 10 Feb 2016
Print article
The widespread belief that radiation from X-rays can cause cancer is based on an invalid paradigm for estimating low-dose radiation exposure risk, according to a new study.

According to researchers at Loyola University Medical Center (Maywood, IL, USA), the linear no-threshold (LNT) model, which is constantly used today to provide risk estimates for cancer resulting from any exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation, is unsound. They claim the paradigm, which is used for X-Rays and computerized tomography (CT) imaging, among others, is only theoretical, and has never been conclusively demonstrated by any empirical evidence.

The also reappraised the original studies, which date back more than 70 years, which concluded that the well-established cancer-causing effects of high doses of radiation are extended downward in a straight line down to zero dose level. They concluded that these risk estimates, defined by of the LNT model, are erroneous, as the original studies in fruit flies, which concluded there is no safe level of radiation, had not been done at truly low doses.

In fact, a study that actually exposed fruit flies to low-dose radiation wasn't conducted until 2009, and that study did not support the LNT model. Studies of atomic bomb survivors and epidemiological studies of human populations have also never conclusively demonstrated that low-dose radiation exposure can cause cancer. The new study refuting the LNT model and calling for its decisive abandonment was published in February 2016 issue of the American Journal of Clinical Oncology.

“The LNT model dissuades many physicians from using appropriate imaging techniques and discourages many in the public from getting proper and needed imaging, all in the name of avoiding any radiation exposure,” concluded corresponding author Prof. James Welsh, MD, and colleagues. “Any claim that low-dose radiation from medical imaging procedures is known to cause cancer should be vigorously challenged, because it serves to alarm and perhaps harm, rather than educate.”

Low-dose radiation exposure due to natural background radiation bathes every single person on Earth, at levels that vary annually from a few mGy to 260 mGy, depending upon where one lives on the planet. Irrespective of the level of background exposure to a given population, no associated health effects have been documented to date anywhere in the world. In fact, people are living longer today than ever before, likely due to improving levels of medical care, which include radiation exposure from diagnostic medical radiation, which are well within the background dose range across the globe.

Related Links:

Loyola University Medical Center


Gold Member
Solid State Kv/Dose Multi-Sensor
AGMS-DM+
New
Enterprise Imaging & Reporting Solution
Syngo Carbon
Oncology Information System
RayCare
New
Wireless Handheld Ultrasound System
TE Air

Print article
Radcal

Channels

MRI

view channel
Image: Shorter scan to diagnose prostate cancer can increase availability and reduce cost (Photo courtesy of 123RF)

Two-Part MRI Scan Detects Prostate Cancer More Quickly without Compromising Diagnostic Quality

Prostate cancer ranks as the most prevalent cancer among men. Over the last decade, the introduction of MRI scans has significantly transformed the diagnosis process, marking the most substantial advancement... Read more

Nuclear Medicine

view channel
Image: The radiotheranostic platform employs a MUC16-targeting humanized antibody, huAR9.6 (Photo courtesy of MSK)

New Radiotheranostic System Detects and Treats Ovarian Cancer Noninvasively

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological cancer, with less than a 30% five-year survival rate for those diagnosed in late stages. Despite surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy being the standard... Read more

General/Advanced Imaging

view channel
Image: The Tyche machine-learning model could help capture crucial information. (Photo courtesy of 123RF)

New AI Method Captures Uncertainty in Medical Images

In the field of biomedicine, segmentation is the process of annotating pixels from an important structure in medical images, such as organs or cells. Artificial Intelligence (AI) models are utilized to... Read more

Imaging IT

view channel
Image: The new Medical Imaging Suite makes healthcare imaging data more accessible, interoperable and useful (Photo courtesy of Google Cloud)

New Google Cloud Medical Imaging Suite Makes Imaging Healthcare Data More Accessible

Medical imaging is a critical tool used to diagnose patients, and there are billions of medical images scanned globally each year. Imaging data accounts for about 90% of all healthcare data1 and, until... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.